https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44121 Article 226 relief was unavailable because mandamus lies only to enforce a legally enforceable right, and the foreign petitioners could not rely on fundamental rights unavailable to foreigners in these customs proceedings. The request for re-export was also unsuitable for writ adjudication because ownership of the goods was disputed, the bank held the shipping documents, and confiscation/adjudication under the Customs Act was pending. The existence of the statutory appellate remedy under Section 129A further weighed against exercise of writ discretion, so the High Court declined to grant the requested mandamus. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:25:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44121 Article 226 relief was unavailable because mandamus lies only to enforce a legally enforceable right, and the foreign petitioners could not rely on fundamental rights unavailable to foreigners in these customs proceedings. The request for re-export was also unsuitable for writ adjudication because ownership of the goods was disputed, the bank held the shipping documents, and confiscation/adjudication under the Customs Act was pending. The existence of the statutory appellate remedy under Section 129A further weighed against exercise of writ discretion, so the High Court declined to grant the requested mandamus. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44121