<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1576 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462236</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal upheld the taxpayer&#039;s exemption claim for long-term capital gains under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The court found the share transactions genuine, conducted through recognized stock exchanges with Securities Transaction Tax paid. The Revenue&#039;s challenge based on SEBI investigation reports was rejected due to lack of specific evidence against the taxpayer. The addition under section 68 was deleted, affirming the legitimacy of the capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1576 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462236</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal upheld the taxpayer&#039;s exemption claim for long-term capital gains under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The court found the share transactions genuine, conducted through recognized stock exchanges with Securities Transaction Tax paid. The Revenue&#039;s challenge based on SEBI investigation reports was rejected due to lack of specific evidence against the taxpayer. The addition under section 68 was deleted, affirming the legitimacy of the capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>