<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44118</link>
    <description>The Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to decide the suit due to the provisions of Section 11B(4) and (5) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The court dismissed the suit, allowing an appeal for the plaintiff to file before the Assistant Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) within one month. The refund of the amount paid by the Department to the plaintiff was made subject to the appeal&#039;s outcome, with no cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44118</link>
      <description>The Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to decide the suit due to the provisions of Section 11B(4) and (5) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The court dismissed the suit, allowing an appeal for the plaintiff to file before the Assistant Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) within one month. The refund of the amount paid by the Department to the plaintiff was made subject to the appeal&#039;s outcome, with no cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>