<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44117</link>
    <description>Where smuggled goods are seized within an officer&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the Customs Act permits that officer to adjudicate confiscation and penalty proceedings against all persons liable under Section 112(b), even if some acted outside the territorial limits. The Court reasoned that the Act contains no territorial restriction confining action only to persons physically present within the officer&#039;s area, and civil procedure concepts of territorial jurisdiction cannot be imported to limit customs adjudication. It also held that there was no statutory bar in Section 122 preventing such proceedings where the seized goods were within jurisdiction and liable to confiscation under Section 111.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44117</link>
      <description>Where smuggled goods are seized within an officer&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, the Customs Act permits that officer to adjudicate confiscation and penalty proceedings against all persons liable under Section 112(b), even if some acted outside the territorial limits. The Court reasoned that the Act contains no territorial restriction confining action only to persons physically present within the officer&#039;s area, and civil procedure concepts of territorial jurisdiction cannot be imported to limit customs adjudication. It also held that there was no statutory bar in Section 122 preventing such proceedings where the seized goods were within jurisdiction and liable to confiscation under Section 111.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>