https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44113 The court ruled against the petitioners in a case concerning liability for customs duty on imported material, holding that the exemption under Notification No. 210/82 was modified in public interest by subsequent amendments. The court applied the Supreme Court judgment in Kasinka Trading case to support its decision, directing the petitioners to make the duty payment within four weeks, enforceable through a bank guarantee in case of default. No costs were awarded in the matter, and the court found no merit in the writ petition, discharging the rule. en-us Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44113 The court ruled against the petitioners in a case concerning liability for customs duty on imported material, holding that the exemption under Notification No. 210/82 was modified in public interest by subsequent amendments. The court applied the Supreme Court judgment in Kasinka Trading case to support its decision, directing the petitioners to make the duty payment within four weeks, enforceable through a bank guarantee in case of default. No costs were awarded in the matter, and the court found no merit in the writ petition, discharging the rule. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44113