https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44107 Appeals were disposed of with liberty to the appellant to approach the Tribunal and draw attention to the production of central excise licences, and to argue that Rule 56C had ceased to operate from March 1986 and that Notification No. 214/86 required only the filing of a letter. The Supreme Court expressed no opinion on the merits or correctness of those contentions, leaving them open for consideration before the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:38:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44107 Appeals were disposed of with liberty to the appellant to approach the Tribunal and draw attention to the production of central excise licences, and to argue that Rule 56C had ceased to operate from March 1986 and that Notification No. 214/86 required only the filing of a letter. The Supreme Court expressed no opinion on the merits or correctness of those contentions, leaving them open for consideration before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44107