<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 66 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44106</link>
    <description>Once the Tribunal had found the evidence sufficient to decide the dispute on merits, a further remand to the Collector was inappropriate. An appellate body that is able to reach a substantive conclusion should ordinarily dispose of the entire controversy itself, rather than send the matter back after deciding an issue against one party. The remand order was therefore unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:37:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 66 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44106</link>
      <description>Once the Tribunal had found the evidence sufficient to decide the dispute on merits, a further remand to the Collector was inappropriate. An appellate body that is able to reach a substantive conclusion should ordinarily dispose of the entire controversy itself, rather than send the matter back after deciding an issue against one party. The remand order was therefore unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>