<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772038</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing technical know-how fees as legitimate business expense, noting both parties fell within same tax bracket with no additional benefit. AO&#039;s disallowance lacked specific discrepancies and contradicted previous years&#039; acceptance, violating consistency principle. Power and fuel expenses disallowance was also deleted as AO failed to establish captive power plant didn&#039;t generate power for manufacturing. Regarding section 14A disallowance, ITAT confirmed only investments yielding exempt income should be considered per Delhi HC precedents, not total investments. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 08:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772038</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing technical know-how fees as legitimate business expense, noting both parties fell within same tax bracket with no additional benefit. AO&#039;s disallowance lacked specific discrepancies and contradicted previous years&#039; acceptance, violating consistency principle. Power and fuel expenses disallowance was also deleted as AO failed to establish captive power plant didn&#039;t generate power for manufacturing. Regarding section 14A disallowance, ITAT confirmed only investments yielding exempt income should be considered per Delhi HC precedents, not total investments. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>