<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 166 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772053</link>
    <description>The HC examined the validity of a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 after 1 April 2021. Relying on SC precedents in Rajeev Bansal and Deepak Steel, the court held that such notices are barred by limitation. The court quashed the reassessment notice, accepting the Revenue&#039;s concession that notices issued after 1 April 2021 for AY 2015-16 cannot be sustained under the amended tax regime and TOLA Act, 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 08:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 166 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772053</link>
      <description>The HC examined the validity of a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 after 1 April 2021. Relying on SC precedents in Rajeev Bansal and Deepak Steel, the court held that such notices are barred by limitation. The court quashed the reassessment notice, accepting the Revenue&#039;s concession that notices issued after 1 April 2021 for AY 2015-16 cannot be sustained under the amended tax regime and TOLA Act, 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>