<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1747 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462225</link>
    <description>AT partially allowed appeal in transfer pricing case, directing exclusion of five large companies from comparable set and restoration of six companies for fresh examination. Key holdings include validating turnover filter as a comparability criterion, permitting restoration of rejected companies with new evidence, and allowing assessee to propose comparables before appellate authorities. Matter remanded for reconsideration to ensure accurate arm&#039;s length price determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1747 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462225</link>
      <description>AT partially allowed appeal in transfer pricing case, directing exclusion of five large companies from comparable set and restoration of six companies for fresh examination. Key holdings include validating turnover filter as a comparability criterion, permitting restoration of rejected companies with new evidence, and allowing assessee to propose comparables before appellate authorities. Matter remanded for reconsideration to ensure accurate arm&#039;s length price determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>