<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1191 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462232</link>
    <description>HC upheld rejection of delay condonation for Form 10BB filing. The court found inadvertent filing of incorrect form and 143-day delay did not constitute genuine hardship under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Petitioner&#039;s explanation was insufficient, and the CIT&#039;s discretionary power was correctly exercised. Writ petition dismissed, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 10:04:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1191 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462232</link>
      <description>HC upheld rejection of delay condonation for Form 10BB filing. The court found inadvertent filing of incorrect form and 143-day delay did not constitute genuine hardship under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Petitioner&#039;s explanation was insufficient, and the CIT&#039;s discretionary power was correctly exercised. Writ petition dismissed, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>