<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462218</link>
    <description>Unfilled direct recruitment vacancies in the Section Officers&#039; Grade could be carried forward for up to two recruitment years and, if still unfilled, transferred to the other recruitment quota under the amended rules. The earlier view that such vacancies had to be treated as permanently available to promotees was a misreading of the rule scheme. Seniority had therefore to be prepared on the basis of the carry-forward mechanism recognised by the rules, and the Government&#039;s seniority list had to be revised accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462218</link>
      <description>Unfilled direct recruitment vacancies in the Section Officers&#039; Grade could be carried forward for up to two recruitment years and, if still unfilled, transferred to the other recruitment quota under the amended rules. The earlier view that such vacancies had to be treated as permanently available to promotees was a misreading of the rule scheme. Seniority had therefore to be prepared on the basis of the carry-forward mechanism recognised by the rules, and the Government&#039;s seniority list had to be revised accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>