https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44086 In a c.i.f. sale of imported raisins rejected as unfit for human consumption, the court applied the Sale of Goods Act principles on sale by sample, implied merchantable quality, and the buyer's right of inspection and rejection. It held that endorsement of the bill of lading and transfer of title did not, by itself, absolve the canalising agency of responsibility where the consignment had been rejected by Port Health Authorities and statutory proceedings were pending. The petitioner was not required to bear sole responsibility for the port and customs process, and the agency was directed to take steps in relation to those proceedings for the limited purpose of the rejected goods. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:50:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44086 In a c.i.f. sale of imported raisins rejected as unfit for human consumption, the court applied the Sale of Goods Act principles on sale by sample, implied merchantable quality, and the buyer's right of inspection and rejection. It held that endorsement of the bill of lading and transfer of title did not, by itself, absolve the canalising agency of responsibility where the consignment had been rejected by Port Health Authorities and statutory proceedings were pending. The petitioner was not required to bear sole responsibility for the port and customs process, and the agency was directed to take steps in relation to those proceedings for the limited purpose of the rejected goods. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44086