<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771990</link>
    <description>DRI officers were confirmed as &quot;proper officers&quot; under the Customs Act, 1962, with authority to issue show cause notices. The SC upheld the retrospective validation through Finance Act, 2022, which cured previous jurisdictional defects identified in the Canon India case. Writ petitions challenging DRI officers&#039; jurisdiction were disposed of, with directions to restore notices for adjudication and allow appeals before CESTAT within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771990</link>
      <description>DRI officers were confirmed as &quot;proper officers&quot; under the Customs Act, 1962, with authority to issue show cause notices. The SC upheld the retrospective validation through Finance Act, 2022, which cured previous jurisdictional defects identified in the Canon India case. Writ petitions challenging DRI officers&#039; jurisdiction were disposed of, with directions to restore notices for adjudication and allow appeals before CESTAT within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>