https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771889 A party impleaded as a legal heir after due inquiry could not later seek deletion of his name on the same concluded issue, because res judicata applied even at a later stage of the same proceeding. The asserted tenancy also failed to attract protection under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, as subsisting tenancy and exclusive possession were not established on the materials. In a decree for specific performance, possession may be implicit where it is incidental to completion of the transaction; on the facts noted, the decree-holder was entitled to vacant and peaceful possession in execution. en-us Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 11:45:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771889 A party impleaded as a legal heir after due inquiry could not later seek deletion of his name on the same concluded issue, because res judicata applied even at a later stage of the same proceeding. The asserted tenancy also failed to attract protection under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, as subsisting tenancy and exclusive possession were not established on the materials. In a decree for specific performance, possession may be implicit where it is incidental to completion of the transaction; on the facts noted, the decree-holder was entitled to vacant and peaceful possession in execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771889