<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771891</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed on remand must show genuine reconsideration in line with the appellate directions; a verbatim repetition of the earlier order, without dealing with the remand material or correcting earlier errors, reflects non-application of mind and is unsustainable. The Court found that the impugned assessment orders were substantially identical to the set-aside orders, with no indication that the Assessing Authority had considered the earlier appellate order or complied with the remand mandate. The orders were therefore quashed, and the matter was sent back for fresh orders after considering the remand directions and giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771891</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed on remand must show genuine reconsideration in line with the appellate directions; a verbatim repetition of the earlier order, without dealing with the remand material or correcting earlier errors, reflects non-application of mind and is unsustainable. The Court found that the impugned assessment orders were substantially identical to the set-aside orders, with no indication that the Assessing Authority had considered the earlier appellate order or complied with the remand mandate. The orders were therefore quashed, and the matter was sent back for fresh orders after considering the remand directions and giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>