<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771895</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that bariatric surgery is distinct from cosmetic surgery and not liable for service tax. The Tribunal found bariatric surgery restricts patient intake capacity for weight loss to control obesity-related diseases, while cosmetic surgery improves body appearance. Bariatric surgery is performed only on patients with morbid obesity (BMI over 32.5) and co-morbidities. Based on relevant circulars, medical association clarifications, and previous identical decisions, the Tribunal concluded bariatric surgery cannot be considered cosmetic surgery under Section 65(105)(zzzzk) of the Finance Act. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771895</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that bariatric surgery is distinct from cosmetic surgery and not liable for service tax. The Tribunal found bariatric surgery restricts patient intake capacity for weight loss to control obesity-related diseases, while cosmetic surgery improves body appearance. Bariatric surgery is performed only on patients with morbid obesity (BMI over 32.5) and co-morbidities. Based on relevant circulars, medical association clarifications, and previous identical decisions, the Tribunal concluded bariatric surgery cannot be considered cosmetic surgery under Section 65(105)(zzzzk) of the Finance Act. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>