<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 33 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771920</link>
    <description>Tribunal found the advance licences used for copper scrap clearance were forged. The SC upheld customs duty demand of Rs. 63,71,517/- under Section 28, confiscated goods under Section 111(o), and imposed Rs. 15,00,000/- penalty under Section 112 against the appellant for abetting duty evasion through fraudulent licences. The decision emphasized that exemption benefits cannot be claimed using forged documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 33 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771920</link>
      <description>Tribunal found the advance licences used for copper scrap clearance were forged. The SC upheld customs duty demand of Rs. 63,71,517/- under Section 28, confiscated goods under Section 111(o), and imposed Rs. 15,00,000/- penalty under Section 112 against the appellant for abetting duty evasion through fraudulent licences. The decision emphasized that exemption benefits cannot be claimed using forged documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>