<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771926</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal in part regarding a state government undertaking acting as nodal agency. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 150 crores grant received from Government of Telangana, holding that since the entire amount was transferred back-to-back to implementing agencies on the same dates, it was not income in the appellant&#039;s hands. However, the tribunal upheld disallowance of Rs. 547.50 crores interest expenditure under section 43B(d), noting the appellant claimed deduction without accounting the corresponding government grant as income. Issues regarding unexplained investment under section 69, HUDCO loan differences, and brought forward business losses were remanded to AO for fresh examination. Addition of unrecorded rent was partially sustained at Rs. 4.60 lakhs after adjusting already accounted rental income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771926</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal in part regarding a state government undertaking acting as nodal agency. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 150 crores grant received from Government of Telangana, holding that since the entire amount was transferred back-to-back to implementing agencies on the same dates, it was not income in the appellant&#039;s hands. However, the tribunal upheld disallowance of Rs. 547.50 crores interest expenditure under section 43B(d), noting the appellant claimed deduction without accounting the corresponding government grant as income. Issues regarding unexplained investment under section 69, HUDCO loan differences, and brought forward business losses were remanded to AO for fresh examination. Addition of unrecorded rent was partially sustained at Rs. 4.60 lakhs after adjusting already accounted rental income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>