<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771927</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed key issues regarding procedural compliance for tax exemption under Section 11 of Income-Tax Act. Held that filing audit report and Form 10 is directory, not mandatory, and late submissions before assessment completion are acceptable. Typographical errors are curable, and delays can be condoned by CIT(A). Directed AO/CPC to allow exemption, rejecting Revenue&#039;s strict compliance arguments based on established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 12:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771927</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed key issues regarding procedural compliance for tax exemption under Section 11 of Income-Tax Act. Held that filing audit report and Form 10 is directory, not mandatory, and late submissions before assessment completion are acceptable. Typographical errors are curable, and delays can be condoned by CIT(A). Directed AO/CPC to allow exemption, rejecting Revenue&#039;s strict compliance arguments based on established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>