<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed appeals challenging the rejection of tax registration applications. It found the CIT (Exemption) erred by not considering the new proviso to section 12A allowing delay condonation and failing to provide the assessee an opportunity to explain the delay. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions to evaluate the reasonable cause for delay and provide a hearing before passing new orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed appeals challenging the rejection of tax registration applications. It found the CIT (Exemption) erred by not considering the new proviso to section 12A allowing delay condonation and failing to provide the assessee an opportunity to explain the delay. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions to evaluate the reasonable cause for delay and provide a hearing before passing new orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>