<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771952</link>
    <description>Tribunal resolved a tax dispute involving revisional powers under section 263 of Income Tax Act. After detailed analysis, the court held that the Commissioner&#039;s revision order was unjustified, as the Assessing Officer had conducted proper enquiry and taken a plausible view regarding utilization of accumulated surplus. The tribunal quashed the revision order, emphasizing that section 263 should be applied sparingly and only when an assessment is clearly erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771952</link>
      <description>Tribunal resolved a tax dispute involving revisional powers under section 263 of Income Tax Act. After detailed analysis, the court held that the Commissioner&#039;s revision order was unjustified, as the Assessing Officer had conducted proper enquiry and taken a plausible view regarding utilization of accumulated surplus. The tribunal quashed the revision order, emphasizing that section 263 should be applied sparingly and only when an assessment is clearly erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>