<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 79 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771966</link>
    <description>Cross charges for corporate support services were not fees for included services under Article 12(4) of the India-US DTAA because the services were broad support functions and did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian entities. Cross charges for software and related facilities were not royalty under Article 12(3) because the Indian entities obtained no copyright or equivalent proprietary rights in the software, and payment for use of software or facilities alone was insufficient. On both treaty grounds, the withholding-tax position could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to the certificate sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 79 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771966</link>
      <description>Cross charges for corporate support services were not fees for included services under Article 12(4) of the India-US DTAA because the services were broad support functions and did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian entities. Cross charges for software and related facilities were not royalty under Article 12(3) because the Indian entities obtained no copyright or equivalent proprietary rights in the software, and payment for use of software or facilities alone was insufficient. On both treaty grounds, the withholding-tax position could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to the certificate sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>