<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 87 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771974</link>
    <description>A show cause cum demand notice that has already been adjudicated merges into the final order in original, so it cannot ordinarily be pursued as a separate challenge. The connected application was therefore not entertained independently. The petitioners were, however, permitted to challenge both the show cause notice and the adjudication order together in a composite manner in accordance with law, if so advised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 87 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771974</link>
      <description>A show cause cum demand notice that has already been adjudicated merges into the final order in original, so it cannot ordinarily be pursued as a separate challenge. The connected application was therefore not entertained independently. The petitioners were, however, permitted to challenge both the show cause notice and the adjudication order together in a composite manner in accordance with law, if so advised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>