<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 91 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771978</link>
    <description>HC invalidated GST proceedings due to procedural defects in digital signature requirements. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed respondents to reinitiate proceedings in compliance with statutory mandates, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural formalities in tax assessment processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 13:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 91 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771978</link>
      <description>HC invalidated GST proceedings due to procedural defects in digital signature requirements. The court set aside the impugned order and allowed respondents to reinitiate proceedings in compliance with statutory mandates, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural formalities in tax assessment processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>