<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771982</link>
    <description>An amount deposited through a personal ledger account was treated as valid pre-deposit for maintainability of an appeal under Section 107(6)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The cited precedent accepted such a deposit as sufficient compliance, and the respondents did not dispute that position. Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement could not be sustained, and the petitioner succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771982</link>
      <description>An amount deposited through a personal ledger account was treated as valid pre-deposit for maintainability of an appeal under Section 107(6)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The cited precedent accepted such a deposit as sufficient compliance, and the respondents did not dispute that position. Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement could not be sustained, and the petitioner succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>