<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 96 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771983</link>
    <description>SC examined the tax liability for internally generated services between distinct corporate entities. The Court found the Adjudicating Authority erred in assessing IGST without considering CBIC Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST. Relying on precedent in Metal One Corporation, the SC directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing that where no invoice is issued and full input tax credit is available, service value may be deemed nil, potentially eliminating tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 96 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771983</link>
      <description>SC examined the tax liability for internally generated services between distinct corporate entities. The Court found the Adjudicating Authority erred in assessing IGST without considering CBIC Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST. Relying on precedent in Metal One Corporation, the SC directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing that where no invoice is issued and full input tax credit is available, service value may be deemed nil, potentially eliminating tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>