<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771988</link>
    <description>Excess stock detected under GST must be addressed through assessment and demand proceedings under sections 73 and 74 of the UPGST Act rather than confiscation proceedings under section 130. Invoking section 130 solely on the basis of excess stock is impermissible. Orders initiated under the confiscation provision were quashed, the petition succeeded, and any deposited amount was directed to be refunded in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771988</link>
      <description>Excess stock detected under GST must be addressed through assessment and demand proceedings under sections 73 and 74 of the UPGST Act rather than confiscation proceedings under section 130. Invoking section 130 solely on the basis of excess stock is impermissible. Orders initiated under the confiscation provision were quashed, the petition succeeded, and any deposited amount was directed to be refunded in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>