https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44066 The High Court quashed the ex parte order because the petitioners were denied a meaningful opportunity to file a reply and be heard before the authority. It directed that the reply be filed within a week and that the matter be decided afresh after hearing the petitioners. The Court also refused to reject the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy, holding that the peculiar facts and circumstances justified writ intervention. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:07:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44066 The High Court quashed the ex parte order because the petitioners were denied a meaningful opportunity to file a reply and be heard before the authority. It directed that the reply be filed within a week and that the matter be decided afresh after hearing the petitioners. The Court also refused to reject the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy, holding that the peculiar facts and circumstances justified writ intervention. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44066