<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462196</link>
    <description>A public servant commits criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act when she abuses official position to secure a valuable thing or pecuniary advantage for herself or others. On the evidence, the plot application, conversion and enhancement of plot area, and allotments in the daughters&#039; names were treated as obtained through misuse of office and manipulation of eligibility and funding conditions, so the conviction was upheld. The request for concurrent running of substantive sentences was rejected because the convictions arose from distinct transactions. The sentence of imprisonment was reduced from three years to two years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 18:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1746 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462196</link>
      <description>A public servant commits criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act when she abuses official position to secure a valuable thing or pecuniary advantage for herself or others. On the evidence, the plot application, conversion and enhancement of plot area, and allotments in the daughters&#039; names were treated as obtained through misuse of office and manipulation of eligibility and funding conditions, so the conviction was upheld. The request for concurrent running of substantive sentences was rejected because the convictions arose from distinct transactions. The sentence of imprisonment was reduced from three years to two years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>