https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771881 ITAT Cuttack set aside CIT(A)'s order under section 250 for failing to comply with statutory requirements. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal without examining records, adjudicating grounds of appeal, or providing reasoned decision as mandated under section 250(6). The tribunal noted CIT(A) merely discussed assessee's non-compliance with notices regarding net profit additions and current account closing balance. Following precedent from Ajji Basha case, ITAT held CIT(A) cannot dispose appeals by simply endorsing AO's order without proper adjudication. Matter remitted back to CIT(A) for fresh disposal with speaking order addressing all grounds on merit. en-us Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 May 2025 08:48:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771881 ITAT Cuttack set aside CIT(A)'s order under section 250 for failing to comply with statutory requirements. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal without examining records, adjudicating grounds of appeal, or providing reasoned decision as mandated under section 250(6). The tribunal noted CIT(A) merely discussed assessee's non-compliance with notices regarding net profit additions and current account closing balance. Following precedent from Ajji Basha case, ITAT held CIT(A) cannot dispose appeals by simply endorsing AO's order without proper adjudication. Matter remitted back to CIT(A) for fresh disposal with speaking order addressing all grounds on merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771881