https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88940 ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving two primary issues. The tribunal rejected Revenue's claims regarding an alleged accommodation entry transaction, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of bogus unsecured loans. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under section 68 and section 69C, determining that the INR 4 crore received was from a legitimate sale transaction of convertible debentures. Additionally, the tribunal prevented double disallowance under section 14A by recognizing the assessee's suo motu disallowance, thereby preventing impermissible addition of non-existent expenditure. Consequently, all grounds raised in Revenue's appeal were dismissed. en-us Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530 Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88940 ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving two primary issues. The tribunal rejected Revenue's claims regarding an alleged accommodation entry transaction, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of bogus unsecured loans. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under section 68 and section 69C, determining that the INR 4 crore received was from a legitimate sale transaction of convertible debentures. Additionally, the tribunal prevented double disallowance under section 14A by recognizing the assessee's suo motu disallowance, thereby preventing impermissible addition of non-existent expenditure. Consequently, all grounds raised in Revenue's appeal were dismissed. Highlights Income Tax Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88940