<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2101 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771829</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA confirmed attachment of appellant&#039;s property as proceeds of crime under PMLA in connection with NSEL scam. Appellant&#039;s husband, an Assistant VP at NSEL, was involved in fraudulent activities including granting memberships to dubious entities and manipulating documents. The tribunal rejected appellant&#039;s defense that property was purchased from legitimate consultancy income from Aastha group, finding it false and an afterthought. Despite not being charge-sheeted in police case, appellant faced charges in ED&#039;s prosecution complaint. The tribunal held that property valued under Rs. 30 lakhs provided no benefit given the crores involved in fraud. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2101 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771829</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA confirmed attachment of appellant&#039;s property as proceeds of crime under PMLA in connection with NSEL scam. Appellant&#039;s husband, an Assistant VP at NSEL, was involved in fraudulent activities including granting memberships to dubious entities and manipulating documents. The tribunal rejected appellant&#039;s defense that property was purchased from legitimate consultancy income from Aastha group, finding it false and an afterthought. Despite not being charge-sheeted in police case, appellant faced charges in ED&#039;s prosecution complaint. The tribunal held that property valued under Rs. 30 lakhs provided no benefit given the crores involved in fraud. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>