<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2117 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771845</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed a tax exemption dispute involving 80G approval. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application due to non-response to notices and claiming deduction under section 11. While initially rejecting the application, the Tribunal directed reconsideration after the assessee obtained permanent registration under section 12AB, providing an opportunity to substantiate the 80G approval claim with fresh documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2117 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771845</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed a tax exemption dispute involving 80G approval. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application due to non-response to notices and claiming deduction under section 11. While initially rejecting the application, the Tribunal directed reconsideration after the assessee obtained permanent registration under section 12AB, providing an opportunity to substantiate the 80G approval claim with fresh documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>