<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2126 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771854</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed proceedings under Section 153A for assessment years 2019-20 and 2020-21 due to procedural violations. Cash of Rs. 10 lakh was found during election period, but the department failed to comply with Rule 112F and CBDT Circular No.10 of 2012. The Investigation Officer did not issue the required certificate with Director General approval before initiating proceedings. Despite finding cash and diary during surveillance, no proper investigation was conducted. The tribunal held that without following prescribed procedures for election period seizures, the assessment officer could not validly issue Section 153A notices for six earlier assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 11:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2126 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771854</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed proceedings under Section 153A for assessment years 2019-20 and 2020-21 due to procedural violations. Cash of Rs. 10 lakh was found during election period, but the department failed to comply with Rule 112F and CBDT Circular No.10 of 2012. The Investigation Officer did not issue the required certificate with Director General approval before initiating proceedings. Despite finding cash and diary during surveillance, no proper investigation was conducted. The tribunal held that without following prescribed procedures for election period seizures, the assessment officer could not validly issue Section 153A notices for six earlier assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>