<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2132 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771860</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained cash deposits in bank account. Despite multiple opportunities, the assessee failed to provide valid explanation for the source of deposited cash. The addition made by assessing officer was confirmed by CIT(A). Before ITAT, no written submissions were filed and no representative appeared for the assessee. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with CIT(A)&#039;s order and upheld the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2132 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771860</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained cash deposits in bank account. Despite multiple opportunities, the assessee failed to provide valid explanation for the source of deposited cash. The addition made by assessing officer was confirmed by CIT(A). Before ITAT, no written submissions were filed and no representative appeared for the assessee. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with CIT(A)&#039;s order and upheld the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>