<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2135 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771863</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an income tax assessment order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory appeal remedies before the Commissioner of Income Tax and ITAT. The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not a substitute for statutory appeals, and procedural or natural justice concerns should be addressed through the established appellate mechanism in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2135 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771863</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an income tax assessment order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory appeal remedies before the Commissioner of Income Tax and ITAT. The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not a substitute for statutory appeals, and procedural or natural justice concerns should be addressed through the established appellate mechanism in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>