<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2140 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771868</link>
    <description>The Madras HC condoned a 192-day delay in filing a GST appeal, holding that the proprietor&#039;s ill-health and resulting inability to pursue the appeal constituted reasonable cause. As the appeal had been rejected solely on limitation, the Court exercised writ jurisdiction to permit a hearing on merits and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2140 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771868</link>
      <description>The Madras HC condoned a 192-day delay in filing a GST appeal, holding that the proprietor&#039;s ill-health and resulting inability to pursue the appeal constituted reasonable cause. As the appeal had been rejected solely on limitation, the Court exercised writ jurisdiction to permit a hearing on merits and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>