<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44038</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the appellate court&#039;s acquittal and found the respondent guilty under Section 135(1)(b)(ii) of the Customs Act. The respondent was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for the period already served and a fine of Rs. 5000, with an additional six months of rigorous imprisonment in default of payment. The court emphasized the procedural aspects of the Customs Act, the burden of proof, and the significance of reasonable belief in smuggling cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44038</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the appellate court&#039;s acquittal and found the respondent guilty under Section 135(1)(b)(ii) of the Customs Act. The respondent was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for the period already served and a fine of Rs. 5000, with an additional six months of rigorous imprisonment in default of payment. The court emphasized the procedural aspects of the Customs Act, the burden of proof, and the significance of reasonable belief in smuggling cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>