https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44035 In a warrant case, discharge under Section 245 CrPC depends on whether the evidence recorded under Section 244, if left unrebutted, would warrant conviction. Mere familiarity with an accused, or prior dealings in contraband, does not by itself create a live link to the present offence. Where the record contains no material sufficient to justify conviction if unrebutted, framing of charge is not warranted and the discharge order should stand. The ruling applies the threshold for discharge by requiring real incriminating material, not suspicion or association alone. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2019 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44035 In a warrant case, discharge under Section 245 CrPC depends on whether the evidence recorded under Section 244, if left unrebutted, would warrant conviction. Mere familiarity with an accused, or prior dealings in contraband, does not by itself create a live link to the present offence. Where the record contains no material sufficient to justify conviction if unrebutted, framing of charge is not warranted and the discharge order should stand. The ruling applies the threshold for discharge by requiring real incriminating material, not suspicion or association alone. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44035