https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44029 Explanation VIII to Section 11 CPC extends res judicata to decisions of courts with limited pecuniary or special jurisdiction, so a matter directly and substantially in issue, once finally decided by such a competent court, cannot be reopened between the same parties or their privies. The provision is read with Section 11 to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and inconsistent findings. Where earlier injunction decrees had determined title and the extent of a life-estate, a later suit by a successor in title on the same issue was barred, and the challenge to the decrees' binding effect failed. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jan 2019 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44029 Explanation VIII to Section 11 CPC extends res judicata to decisions of courts with limited pecuniary or special jurisdiction, so a matter directly and substantially in issue, once finally decided by such a competent court, cannot be reopened between the same parties or their privies. The provision is read with Section 11 to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and inconsistent findings. Where earlier injunction decrees had determined title and the extent of a life-estate, a later suit by a successor in title on the same issue was barred, and the challenge to the decrees' binding effect failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44029