https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44024 A writ petition challenging show-cause notices under Article 226 was held ordinarily not maintainable where an efficacious statutory remedy exists before the adjudicating authority. The notices alleged contravention of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and wrongful availment of exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. The Court held that the noticee should first file a reply and raise objections before the appropriate statutory forum, and the writ court should not interfere at the notice stage. The petitioner was relegated to the adjudicatory process, and the authority was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:57:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44024 A writ petition challenging show-cause notices under Article 226 was held ordinarily not maintainable where an efficacious statutory remedy exists before the adjudicating authority. The notices alleged contravention of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and wrongful availment of exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. The Court held that the noticee should first file a reply and raise objections before the appropriate statutory forum, and the writ court should not interfere at the notice stage. The petitioner was relegated to the adjudicatory process, and the authority was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44024