https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771715 An order rejecting a refund claim for excess registration fee without reasons was unsustainable because a decision affecting civil consequences must disclose the basis of the authority's conclusion. The cryptic rejection showed a failure to apply mind and could not stand in law. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the competent authority in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771715 An order rejecting a refund claim for excess registration fee without reasons was unsustainable because a decision affecting civil consequences must disclose the basis of the authority's conclusion. The cryptic rejection showed a failure to apply mind and could not stand in law. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the competent authority in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771715