https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771716 A court may permit the prosecution to produce compact discs that were already seized and referred to in the supplementary charge-sheet but were inadvertently omitted from the original filings, so long as no serious prejudice is caused to the accused. The Court treated this as a continuation of the settled principle allowing late production of material already forming part of the prosecution record, and held that later authority did not displace that rule. The stage for such production is not the stage for determining the CDs' authenticity, admissibility, or the ultimate validity of the Section 65B certificate; those issues remain for trial. The prosecution's request was therefore allowed and the appeals failed. en-us Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771716 A court may permit the prosecution to produce compact discs that were already seized and referred to in the supplementary charge-sheet but were inadvertently omitted from the original filings, so long as no serious prejudice is caused to the accused. The Court treated this as a continuation of the settled principle allowing late production of material already forming part of the prosecution record, and held that later authority did not displace that rule. The stage for such production is not the stage for determining the CDs' authenticity, admissibility, or the ultimate validity of the Section 65B certificate; those issues remain for trial. The prosecution's request was therefore allowed and the appeals failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771716