<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2013 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771741</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed customs broker liability for penalty under Section 112 of Customs Act. The court ruled that mere negligence in filing Bill of Entry does not constitute abetment. The customs broker cannot be penalized for unknowingly submitting importer&#039;s declared transaction value, as the Proper Officer exclusively determines assessable value. The penalty was set aside, emphasizing that inadvertent involvement does not attract statutory penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2013 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771741</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed customs broker liability for penalty under Section 112 of Customs Act. The court ruled that mere negligence in filing Bill of Entry does not constitute abetment. The customs broker cannot be penalized for unknowingly submitting importer&#039;s declared transaction value, as the Proper Officer exclusively determines assessable value. The penalty was set aside, emphasizing that inadvertent involvement does not attract statutory penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>