<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2021 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771749</link>
    <description>Value loading of imported goods on the basis of alleged related-party dealings was unsustainable where the imports were from the actual overseas manufacturers and the Hong Kong entity merely issued invoices in the supply chain. The authority&#039;s reliance on borrowings, reimbursements and a transfer-pricing style analysis did not by itself show that the declared transaction value was unacceptable under the Customs Act, 1962. In the absence of evidence that the invoice price was not genuine or that the importer paid more than that price to the supplier, the burden to justify enhancement was not discharged, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2021 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771749</link>
      <description>Value loading of imported goods on the basis of alleged related-party dealings was unsustainable where the imports were from the actual overseas manufacturers and the Hong Kong entity merely issued invoices in the supply chain. The authority&#039;s reliance on borrowings, reimbursements and a transfer-pricing style analysis did not by itself show that the declared transaction value was unacceptable under the Customs Act, 1962. In the absence of evidence that the invoice price was not genuine or that the importer paid more than that price to the supplier, the burden to justify enhancement was not discharged, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>