<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2041 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771769</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed appeals challenging tax authority&#039;s rejection of charitable trust registration. The tribunal found the rejection invalid due to technical errors in online application and violation of natural justice principles. The court directed reconsideration of both section 12AB and 80G(5) registrations, mandating the tax authority to provide proper hearing and evaluate application merits substantively. Key ruling emphasizes procedural fairness over technical non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2041 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771769</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed appeals challenging tax authority&#039;s rejection of charitable trust registration. The tribunal found the rejection invalid due to technical errors in online application and violation of natural justice principles. The court directed reconsideration of both section 12AB and 80G(5) registrations, mandating the tax authority to provide proper hearing and evaluate application merits substantively. Key ruling emphasizes procedural fairness over technical non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>