<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771779</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed tax issues involving accommodation entries and unexplained cash credits. The court found the assessee was a pass-through entity used for routing unaccounted funds. The Rs. 10 crore share capital addition was deleted, while the Rs. 1,70,000 bank deposit was sustained as unexplained income under section 68. The ruling emphasized that mere conduit entities cannot be taxed for transactions where they derive no benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771779</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed tax issues involving accommodation entries and unexplained cash credits. The court found the assessee was a pass-through entity used for routing unaccounted funds. The Rs. 10 crore share capital addition was deleted, while the Rs. 1,70,000 bank deposit was sustained as unexplained income under section 68. The ruling emphasized that mere conduit entities cannot be taxed for transactions where they derive no benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>