<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2056 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771784</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC held that reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid as it was based on change of opinion rather than valid reason to believe. The petitioner had provided complete TDS details during original assessment, and the AO erroneously considered only partial information regarding advertisement and professional fees while ignoring other TDS deductions. Regarding section 80IC deduction, the loss adjustment issue was already considered during regular assessment proceedings, making the reopening merely a review rather than genuine escapement of income. The court emphasized that reopening is not equivalent to review of assessment order, following Supreme Court precedent in Kelvinator case. Assessment reopening was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2056 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771784</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC held that reopening of assessment under section 147 was invalid as it was based on change of opinion rather than valid reason to believe. The petitioner had provided complete TDS details during original assessment, and the AO erroneously considered only partial information regarding advertisement and professional fees while ignoring other TDS deductions. Regarding section 80IC deduction, the loss adjustment issue was already considered during regular assessment proceedings, making the reopening merely a review rather than genuine escapement of income. The court emphasized that reopening is not equivalent to review of assessment order, following Supreme Court precedent in Kelvinator case. Assessment reopening was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>