<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2071 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771799</link>
    <description>A GST assessment order issued without a Document Identification Number (DIN) was treated as invalid, because the Court relied on Supreme Court and coordinate Division Bench authority as well as the CBIC circular requiring DIN in such proceedings. The absence of DIN in the impugned order rendered the proceedings unsustainable, so the order was set aside. Fresh proceedings were left open only after proper notice and assignment of a DIN in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2071 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771799</link>
      <description>A GST assessment order issued without a Document Identification Number (DIN) was treated as invalid, because the Court relied on Supreme Court and coordinate Division Bench authority as well as the CBIC circular requiring DIN in such proceedings. The absence of DIN in the impugned order rendered the proceedings unsustainable, so the order was set aside. Fresh proceedings were left open only after proper notice and assignment of a DIN in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>